. . . and 505,397 to be exact with over 450,000 visitors since I launched this blog June 15, 2006. The most read blogposts are:
1. "We are sorry for any inconvenience caused" (8 October 2010) - 23,179 views
2. "Journal rankings for philosophy" (29 September 2011) - 22,987 views
3. "The top philosophy journals: initial results" (18 January 2011) - 17,902 views
4. "Why publish journal articles?" (4 January 2011) - 6,670 views
5. "Hegel's philosophy attacked by Australia's opposition parties, or "The Politics of What?!" (6 September 2013) - 3,362 views
6. "Equality: the ticket to greater citations?" (2 January 2011) - 3,126 views
7. "Journal of Moral Philosophy joins Thomson Reuters ISI" (11 July 2011) - 2,676 views
8. "Senior academics threaten resignations over Big Society" (23 June 2011) - 1,848 views
9. "Thom Brooks on 'Guidelines on How to Referee'" (2 December 2010) - 1,479 views
10. "The UK citizenship test is 'unfit for purpose': news round-up" (18 March 2013) - 1,300 views
Clearly, my blog has become a central focal point for debates concerning academic journal rankings. I have a strong interest in these discussions given my founding the Journal of Moral Philosophy and I became increasingly alarmed at how many developments worldwide were taking place without full consultation with journal editors and their readers. This led me to re-launch with Carol Gould the Association of Philosophy Journal Editors to bring together philosophy journal editors to share ideas about best practice and the promoting our profession. I know my ranking of philosophy journals has been used by departments in North America and Europe -- and I am tempted to start a new discussion about what these rankings should look like now...
This list also contains some surprises. While my guidelines piece has been well received, I would have thought my piece on publishing advice - which I'm perhaps known for even more and ranks in the top 100 most downloaded SSRN papers all-time - would have made my top 10 blogposts. A second surprise is my news round-up capturing initial media interest in my work on reforming the UK citizenship test makes the top 10, but not a post covering the much wider coverage - in 300+ media outlets - my report on the test received later that spring.
Of course, the biggest surprise of all is that my blog has continued to be received so well for so long. Much of the credit - as always! - must go to my old friend Brian Leiter for his warm support since day one. Much more credit must go to you, my reader, for taking the time to visit these pages. I am extremely grateful - and hope I can provide much of continuing interest in the days, weeks, months and even years ahead!